Monthly Archives: February 2020

Bait

Standard

bait3

This British black and white movie set in a claustrophobic Cornish fishing villagebait7 is a pleasing antidote to the Hollywood blitz of late.  Bait itself has won various prizes for its distinctive grainy style, unusual editing which blends several scenes at the same time or foreshadows or flashes back.  Mark Jenkin does most of the work: direction, screenplay, camera and music producing a unique work.bait6  There is not so much dialogue in the film and the story is conveyed just as much by visual images (draining dishes, boots, window frames, nets and pots) as it is by any conventional narrative.  What dialogue there is fits the Cornish cadences perfectly.

The film is about the clash between locals, losing their fishing industrybait1 and obliged to sell their houses to gentrifying Londonersbait2 who turn them into airbnbs.bait5 It is a portrait of moment of transition and perhaps the loss of old traditions.  The locals led by fisherman Martin (Edward Rowe) are pretty angrybait4 about this and by the arrogant acts of the outsiders. Eventually this leads to a tragedy which provides the dramatic climax to this small but very distinct film.  Good acting but most of all great vision for seeing how to make this film, a throwback to Eisenstein that seems both vintage and highly contemporary at the same time.

♦♦♦♦

Marriage Story

Standard

marriage6

Where to start?  This autopsy of a failing marriage by Noah Baumbach is one of the most impactful movies on the topic for a long time especially given the excellent performances by the two leads: Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver.marriage3  While there is nothing especially new in the plot and the film dwells quite a lot on the role of lawyers in exacerbating these processes in the US, the real value is the way the characters start to wake up to all sorts of features about themselves or their marriage as things emerge.marriage2  Driver and Johansson have several moments when they suddenly start to realise things in a situation that seems to have a life of its own.marriage9  The intelligent screenplay and the command both actors have of their craft heightens this and one particular scene two thirds of the way through is quite electrifyingmarriage1 in this sense.  Laura Dernmarriage7 has been justifiedly honoured for her role as the feisty lawyer and appearances by Ray Liotta and Alan Aldamarriage8 as other lawyers and Julie Hagerty as the mother-in-lawmarriage5 add substance to the movie.

Again, the film is something of an indictment into the way the US has got itself so bogged down in the litigation in these casesmarriage4 instead of protecting the human side.  Despite what the courts and lawyers might say. Not a film to enjoy but would definitely stand up to more than one viewing given its rich detail.

 

4 stars plus

A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood

Standard

beau3

I am not a great Tom Hanks fan and this film which looks at a moment in the life of one of America’s most loved children’s TV presenters and puppeteers from 1968 – 2001 could have been an embarrassment.beau5

To my happy surprise, this movie, directed by Marielle Heller (Can you ever forgive me?), is a lovely tribute to this important educator and a lesson on the importance of emotional intelligence.beau4

Rogers used to teach children about the importance of getting in touch with their feelings and the story here focuses on a hard-bitten journalist Lloyd Vogel (Matthew Rhys) who goes to interview Rogers for an articlebeau2 and ends up having his concepts of the world turned upside down.  Vogel has issues with the world, especially his father (Chris Cooper)beau10 and little by little Rogers helps him unwrap his feelings despite much resistance.beau7

Heller recreates the TV sets, the use of model towns and transport in thembeau8 and the puppets who often voiced what adults couldn’t.beau6  In Tom Hanks she has an intelligent actor who manages to convey the special qualities of Rogers without making him seem like a saint or a goody two shoes.beau1 It is one of his most polished performances given the character he had to portray.

This will not be everyone’s cup of tea but it is a beautiful film that deserves to be widely seen and learned from.beau9  I found it particularly uplifting after the noise barrage of Uncut Gems.

♦♦♦♦+

Uncut Gems

Standard

uncut2

Watching this film thanks to its rave reviews. At one point in the movie, Howard Ratner’s wifeuncut6 says “you are the most annoying person I know!”  My immediate thought was that this is one of the most annoying films I have ever seen. uncut1 Go to Rotten Tomatoes and the film has a 96% approval rating from critics and only 54% from the public.  Enough said.  I cannot understand why so much fanfare for this shit!  Sure, Adam Sandler gives a very convincing performance against type as the jeweler conman/gambling addict uncut7but sitting through his relentlessly noisy story of all his mistakes and bad deeds, all the while hearing him constantly shouting at everyone or being roughed up is no thrill.uncut5  I started feeling sick within a few minutes and the negative energy just goes on and on.  Did someone think it would be fun/funny/entertaining/morally instructive to make a film like this?  I just think that we have been immersed in a massive exercise of bad vibes, which shows how dark and sordid human greed can get.uncut3  Given the “in your face” style it just ends up being stressful and unpleasant.uncut8  Which a few critics did admit (some still giving it a thumbs up!). I could comment on technical issues that I also think failed the film but I really can’t be bothered wasting any more time on this.uncut4  It is probably a two star something as a work of celluloid but I’m lopping off stars because it is really quite obnoxious. A mystery but then again this is the shadow side of the US in full bloom.

Jojo Rabbit

Standard

jojo4

Hard to know where to start with this one other than to say that it is another inspired creation by Taika Waititi.  Between him and the original novel they came up with a subject that no one else would have ever filmed let alone brought off.  The subject is a young boy in Nazi Germany who wants desperately to become part of the Hitler youth,jojo8 so much so that he has Hitler as his imaginary friend.jojo1  Trouble is that he is pretty hopeless as a potential soldier and he has a mother who is harbouring a Jewish girl in the attic.  This creates a big inner conflict in Jojo with hilarious results as he unwittingly both tries to keep the Hitler youth people happy and befriends the girl.jojo3  Waititi misses few opportunities at making fun at the era (witness the Heil Hitler salutes) and gives us both wisdom and laughs intertwined.jojo9

Roman Griffin Davis is a find as Jojo, a completely credible and versatile child actor with no tics.  Archie Yates as his fat friend Yorki is another find.jojo10  Thomasin Mackenziejojo11 from the Harcourt dynasty of Kiwi actors convinces as Elsa, the hidden girl and Taika himself creates a unique gloss of a character in the imaginary Hitler.jojo7  Sam Rockwell and Rebel Wilson have fun as Nazisjojo6 and Scarlett Johansson anchors the film as Rosie, Jojo’s free-spirited mother.jojo2  Filming in the Czech Republic gives us Third Reich style settings which Waititi contrasts with both classical and modern music.  Versions in German of the Beatles I wanna hold your hand and Bowie’s Heroes are particular masterstrokes.  An enjoyable and sobering fantasy all wrapped up in one.jojo5  Tremendous screenplay well deserving of the Oscar.

♦♦♦♦

Jeune Femme

Standard

jeune2

For 80 per cent of this movie I felt irritated by it and the main character, Paula (excellent work by Laetitia Dosch).  Paula has just broken up with her boyfriend of ten years, a well-known photographer who used her as a kind of muse.  Taking his catjeune5 as revenge, she heads out into the streets of Paris with no home, no tertiary education and not much clue about how to treat people.  She bluffs her way into jobsjeune1 and accommodation, breaks the rules constantly and lies a fair bit.jeune3  She doesn’t seem to care about whether she tells the truth or if her comments hurt people; she somehow thinks that people have to accept her frankness for what it is.jeune4  As many reviewers said, she is annoying and you wouldn’t want her around for too long.  Not to mention her lack of thought towards the cat! We see several scenes where she lets people down and her mother has clearly had enough of her.jeune6  In some ways she represents an age group (millennials) and in some ways not.  But towards the end we start to see how her past relationships have probably accentuated certain characteristics in her like her overwhelmingly self-centredness and lack of humility.  If you have been put down for years, it is one possible defence.

Leonor Serraille is a first-time feature director and this is a good start indeed, though it is not a film I would want to revisit.  Nevertheless, she captures a moment very well and gives us a ground zero view of Paris for the young,jeune7 working in precarious jobs, trying to inch ahead and spending plenty of time partying.

♦♦♦

Parasite

Standard

parasite5

Not sure if it is a masterpiece but it comes close.  After 2 hours you come out of Parasite feeling that a monster has taken hold of you and taken you on a wild but contemporary journey, both Shakesperean and Dickensian, and with a dose of sheer horror all wrapped up in social commentary and satire.parasite4  Bong Joon Ho achieves a seldom-seen amalgam of all of this, carefully and creatively constructed.

The basic story is how a family from the poor side of townparasite1 ingratiates its way into the life of a rich familyparasite2 who live in an imposing architecturally designed house on the edge of town.parasite9  Without divulging their family connection, they pose as the English tutor, art therapist, driverparasite10 and housekeeper of the family, assuming these roles as the original people leave  or are fired.parasite8  The ingenuity with which they manage it is one thing.  But it also highlights the gap between rich and poor.  Mrs Park (the rich mother) is gullibleparasite6 and naïve and yet has money to burn, Mrs Kim (the poor mother) is a smart cookie but can barely scrape two pennies together.  Other class differences and unfairness springs to light in the course of the movie.  All this is settled into place by mid-film when a plot developmentparasite12 takes everything to another level and eventually leads to a pretty dynamic denouement. Kang-ho Song as the poor fatherparasite7, Yeo-Jeong Jo as the rich mother and So-dam Park as the poor daughterparasite11 are among the stars in a uniformly good cast.  Photography by Kyung-Ppo Hong and Jaeil Jung’s music also add appreciably to this very complete engaging film.parasite3

♦♦♦♦++

The Farewell

Standard

fare1

This American film is a relatively small movie but does have the merit of showing us an important feature of modern life: the effects of voluntary exile or migration on families who now live in different cultures with very different customs.

Billi (Awkwafina) is an aspiring writer in New York, only daughter of immigrants.  She is very attached to her grandmother who continues living in Changchun, China and they talk most days by phone.fare3  Word gets out that Gran has little time to live so the family which includes another uncle and family living in Japan all descend on Changchun to see Granny.  The catch is that said grandmother mustn’t know about her health status and the family invent a weddingfare7 (of Japanese dwelling grandson to a Japanese girl) as an excuse for all coming together.  No one is the least excited about the wedding and wander around grumpy and forlorn about Gran’s imminent demise.fare5

The film has a clear blend of these tones; humour from the absurd lengths they go to to pretend reality is otherwisefare6 and some nice little observations about modern life (the new hotel with the lifts that don’t work) and cultural norms (Granny trying to match Billi with a young British educated doctor) and a lot of gloom and fear about the matriarch and what life will be like from now on.  For the most part director Lulu Wang handles these extremes well, sometimes the gloomfare2 seems all pervasive. Shuzhen Zhao as the grandmother is a chipper soul, probably wiser than the others give her credit for.  I was less convinced by Awkwafina,fare4 hailed in reviews and awards ceremonies.  She is perfectly OK in her role of fearful granddaughter but it is what you would expect of any actress.  I guess being a departure from her comic and rapping roles, people think she is really showing her versatility.  To me it was less impactful.

A nice inciteful family work about our cross-cultural set ups these days and good to see modern China on screen here.

♦♦♦+

Judy

Standard

judy1

Judy is your typical biopic.  Think Piaf or any other self-destructing star.  It focuses on the last dark days of her life when 6 months before dying she does a season at the Talk of the Town in London to pay debts and in the hope of raising enough to buy a home for her two younger children.judy3  The problem is that she is already shattered emotionally, reliant on drugs and alcohol and “difficult” when it comes to performing.judy9  We see some of these scenes, a whirlwind late marriagejudy4 and some of the showstopping musical numbers.  It is all rather predictable and has quite a number of scenes of Judy sighing, squinting and pouting.judy5  The dialogue is also quite trite as befits perhaps a stage show.  There are some creepy references to Louis B Mayer, the studio head who apparently exploited her as a child.judy7  More could have been seen of that and also her string of short-lived marriages to the “wrong” guys.

What lifts this film tremendously is Renée Zellweger’s performance.judy2  She manages to capture the personality and the behaviour of the star perfectly and is totally charismatic.judy8  Her dancing and singing are also up to the mark and represents her talent and hard work.judy6  A masterclass in representing a real person.

While I felt the film dragged in parts and offered little new, watching Renée’s version of Judy was indeed a pleasure.  Her many prizes are well deserved.

♦♦♦ ++

 

Ford v Ferrari

Standard

ford3

Not my favourite topic but James Mangold manages to give us an exciting and interesting look at the battle for supremacy at Le Mans 1966ford10 between Ferrari and Ford.  Viewed from the US side, we meet Carroll Shelby (correct Matt Damon)ford4 a car racer and designer and his partner Ken Miles, a rookie mechanic and driverford1 with a superb sense of what makes a racing car works.  This pairford2 get hired by the Ford corporation to get them that win over Ferrariford7 but it is a difficult relationship as pompous Henry Ford (grandson of the original) and his suitsford9 do not trust the outsiders even though they need them.

The strong points of this film are the solid narration, though long the film flows very well and is clear to those ignorant of the theme, the excellent photography of Phedon Papamichael, especially the race scenesford6 and the performance of Christian Bale,ford5 unrecognizable here from Vice a year ago and giving us a quirky but unsung genius.  Caitriona Balfeford8 does good service as his wife.  The recreation of the period is well done and to see what Formula One was like before its current incarnation is indeed a treat.

Mangold gives us a sort of traditional David against Goliath Hollywood movie with guaranteed entertainment value.  Not the least of the Oscar hopes.

♦♦♦♦+