Monthly Archives: June 2020

Fete de Famille

Standard

fete2

Dubbed Happy Birthday in English, this French film by Cedric Kahn has had some poor reviews. It is not that bad but suffers from some excesses in the story, direction and action and probably some misleading advertising.  It is not a sort of family get together comedy although it has pretensions in that area.fete4

The setting, a rambling rural house where three children and their partners and grandchildren get together to celebrate the birthday of the grandmother (Catherine Deneuve)fete6 gives the impression that it will be one of those films in which the family skeletons and secrets get an airing in an idyllic location,fete1 this time Lot-en-Garonne near Bordeaux.  The skeletons are there but mostly it is about the reaction of the family to the return of the bipolar sister Claire (Emmanuelle Bercot), who swings wildly from enchanting aunt to screaming virago.fete8  The climax of the film at a candlelit dinner is actually more scary and sad than anything else.  How do you cope with family madness?  It is not just Claire but her brother Romainfete7 is also rather crazy and the extent of this becomes clear in an epilogue.  Some scenes here were over the top such as the visit of the real estate agent to the house with Claire bouncing up and down on the beds with a lascivious look but mostly the story and acting was credible enough.  Perhaps some of the plot developments were a little overwrittenfete9 or calculated (the children’s play and Romain and his girlfriend getting high) but we will accept the poetic licence.fete5  I liked Bercot even if she was completely over-the-top at times. fete3 Deneuve didn’t have that much to do and Vincent Macaigne got into part as Romain.  Someone just needed to put him in his place.

♦♦+

The Man Who Surprised Everyone

Standard

man8

This smallish but beautiful Russian film is a cinematographic version of a fable.  The story is simple.  Egor, a forest guard, married with a second kid on the way, falls ill with cancer and is given two months to live.man7  A second opinion confirms the first doctor.  A visit to a shaman “cleans” him but doesn’t seem to help. man9 Nonetheless, the shaman tells him a story about a drake masquerading as a duckman3 to escape being caught by the grim reaper and Egor processes this as a clue to an option that might have an answer for him – dressing as a woman.man6 He does so and, apart from the adverse reaction of his wife, he has to face the none too benign curiosity of his neighbours obliging him to become a pariah in his own Siberian village.man10 A place that may be the present time but seems largely unchanged for centuries. This is a very deep and meaningful film patiently told with a fairly minimal script.man1  It speaks of our relation to nature (excellent forest scenes), of our social constructs which bind us, of faith, of the unknown, of love and of the search for miracles.man4  Akeksey Chupov and Natasha Merkulovaman5 tell the story in a beautiful way, never preaching or judging.  Evgeniy Tsyganov as Egor does not speak for half the film but conveys so much in his stare and his bodyman2 and Natalya Kudryashova as his wife is more than a match.  Excellent photography from Mart Taniel.

I did not know what to expect of this film but it has ended up being one of the gems for this year

♦♦♦♦++

Late Night

Standard

late2

Gosh, this is a tricky one.  Starring Emma Thompson as a late-night talk show host Katherine Newbury, a sort of English version of Ellen and Chelsea, and the Amero-Indian comedian Mindy Kaling,late1 this film is about how the latter becomes a writer on Katherine’s show and because she stands up for herself in a way the male writers don’t and is from a minority race, is able to help Katherine save her show and her ratings.

Good points: Emma Thompson of course.  Believable, intelligent, able to do throw away lines well.  John Lithgow in a quiet role as her ailing husband.late8  Some of the observations about television and the stressful artificial role of ratings, especially since the revelations about Ellen being a bitch on the set have surfaced.late6  A fairly sharp script.  One or two good bit parters including the guy who starred in Richard Jewell – Paul Walter Hauser.late5

Not so convincing:  I don’t know Mindy Kalinglate9 who emerged from the TV series The Office and has largely carved out a career in television.  Here, she is effective as a change agent but I don’t find her anything special either in terms of presence or acting. Rather a cypher (awkward new girl who achieves more than she should).late4

Some of the observations are rather superficial and stereotyped.

The first part of the movie is quite sound but I lost interest about half way throughlate7 and found it cluttered with all sorts of extra subplots (former affairs, charitable causes) and a fairly tame denouement that didn’t really convince.late3

Watch it for Thompson and move on.  Well-intentioned but doesn’t quiet show the grit it probably needed.

♦♦+

The Taste of Money

Standard

taste8

Another slightly dated movie from 2012, from Sang-soo Im, one of Korea’s most popular directors.  This film went to Cannes and has plenty of visual styletaste2 but after building up a lovely bit of tension over the first two thirds unravels in rather a ridiculous way in the final part.  The subject matter is also a Korean favourite, the excesses of the monied classes and their often despicable behaviour to maintain their wealth and status.taste6

Here we have a family company with a father (Yun-shik Baek)taste3 starting to lose his marbles and bedding the Filipino maid which causes a big fight with his wife, the matriarch (Yuh-Jung Youn, enjoying her Lady Macbeth role).taste5 She is in fact the heiress of the company and her father still whizzes in and out in a wheelchair pushed by a sinister housemaid.  Dad is half crazy, half wise.  There are 2 kids, Chul, who wants to put his stamp on the company but keeps getting into trouble with the law and sent to prison and Nami, a divorced daughter who lives at home and is rather unimpressed with the family behaviour.taste1  All of this is seen through the eyes of the driver/gofer Joo (Kang-woo Kim), a handsome if somewhat put upon servant. taste4 His duties include packing bribe money and bedding the old lady. As the father loses his grip, more and more duties fall on Joo and he is dragged into the family mire.taste7

As I said, the first part is handled very well, lavish sets, subtle and not so subtle power battles and a close look at the decadence of power in Korea today.taste9  Then, however, we have a murder, a suicide attempt, some mile-high sex, a ghost and a pointless fist fight supposedly to resolve everything and it loses a lot of credibility.  Still, it is an enjoyable watch, just needed to be a lot tighter as a story.

♦♦+

Laurence Anyways

Standard

laurence1

At 160 minutes, this film, third by Xavier Dolan, film-maker prodigy from Montreal, is not only quite a lot longer than it needs to be but it is also somewhat uneven.  Nevertheless, considering he made it at 23 it is also quite an achievement and has some excellent scenes and elements to make it last in the memory and to salvage some of the weaker points.

Laurence Alia (Melvil Poupaud)laurence2 is an academic who decides at the age of 35 that he can only be true to himself if he lives his life as a woman from now on. He stresses he is not gay, simply trapped in the wrong body.  This film takes a look at Laurence over the course of ten years or so and his transformation is certainly gradual.  By the end, we are still not sure if he has had a sex change and his wardrobe changes are still far from instant.laurence3  Nonetheless, in the early 90’s of Montreal, this is enough to cost him his job.  He has a girlfriend, Fred(erique),laurence10 a budding film maker and the film is largely about their relationship.  The initial adjustments, a later break up, a potential return, etc.  Subplots deal with Laurence’s relationship with his parents, his colleagues and a new family of “music hall artists” that befriend him.  Much of this is rambling but natural.

So, what are the plusses in the movie?  Plenty of realistic dialogues, even given the less than common plotline, some memorable set pieces: a retro disco night,laurence6 the two principals on an island in winter with clothes falling above them, a blowout fight in a small restaurant, etc.  Dolan is not afraid to be creative and get you believing something that on paper sounds dubious.  There is also a real sense of what Montreal life must have been like in those times,laurence5 especially winter.

While Poupaud is good as Laurencelaurence8 but not great, it is left to Suzanne Clémentlaurence11 as Fred to take the acting laurels in this movie.  She is very satisfactory in a difficult but rewarding role.  Nathalie Bayelaurence9 as Laurence’s mother is fine in support and there are a number of other good actors in bit parts.  Great set design, costumes and hairstyles.laurence4

And good to see at least sides of this issue being tackled in film, though the focus seems more on the emotional impact of Laurence’s decisionlaurence7 than the sex side.

A qualified success therefore leading up to Mommy which was pretty heavy duty.  Sadly, his subsequent two films did not live up to expectations.

♦♦♦♦

Resistance

Standard

resistance4

The last scene of this film in which Jesse Eisenberg in the role of Marcel Marceau, the famous mime, performs for an audience of soldiers is the most movingresistance7 and lifts what is otherwise a very uneven movie.  It tells the story of Marceau, who went from being a butcher’s assistant and frustrated actor to being a key member of the French resistance smuggling Jewish orphans out of the country for which he was awarded the Legion of Honour.  If you came looking for mime, there is some but not too much. resistance3 The film is basically a retelling of how Jewish orphans were received in France from Nazi Germany in the late 30’s only to have to be relocated once again when the Nazis occupied France.  Marcel, his brother, cousin and two sisters, one of whom, Emma is his love interest (Clemence Poésy)resistance6 are among the leaders of this particular group.  First, they move from Strasbourg to Lyon where Marcel’s skills as a forger are also used and there is a rather daring and improbable freeing by Marcel of his cousin George from a Nazi van.resistance1  Torture scenes follow between the sisters and Klaus Barbie, German head of command here.  Barbie is charismatically played by Matthias Schweighoferresistance8 but he is an absolute bastard as are all the other Nazis here.  The final section relates the crossing of the Alps into Switzerland, a perilous journey to safety.resistance2

What I felt was that however meritorious Marceau’s story undoubtedly is and however important it is to keep telling the world about what happened in WW2, there is a certain desire by director and writer Jonathan Jakubowicz to provide an in your face version. While we don’t really ever see the worst of the torture, we do get some tense and shocking build ups and there is very little blend of light and shade.  Some of the plot choices seem overly calculated like the opening and closing by General Patton (Ed Harris), unnecessary and the focus on one girl orphan (Bella Ramsey).resistance5  I know people respond better to stories of individuals than of masses but this is almost too obvious.

Then there is Eisenberg.resistance9  While this is undoubtedly one of his best performances, he still seems like the American star in a European film although I did like his efforts at mime.

♦♦♦

Die Stropers

Standard

stropers1

A taut psychological number set on an Afrikaans farmstropers4 in the Free State.  Jannostropers6 is a 15 year old who is learning the ropes as the eldest child and only son of Jan and Marie who are trying to keep the farm afloatstropers8 in the difficult economic conditions and with the spectre of the racial issues still present but unexplored here.  Life in this part of South Africa is very conservative, religious and austere.stropers2  Janno’s life changes when his parents take in a teenage runaway and street kid, Pieter.stropers9  First, he has to be detoxicated and then Janno is expected to treat him as a brother and, being an obedient son, he tries to do so.  Pieter is somewhat feral, a survivor of teenage prostitution, both seeking and rejecting love and a home and with an instinct that quickly sniffs out things like the state of the parent’s marriage and Janno’s own latent homosexuality.stropers10  Pieter’s presence ends up being a test for the whole family, one the parents feel they have to face up to as being of God’s will.  Matters eventually come to a head and take unexpected turns.stropers5

Etienne Kallos produces an interesting rather tense movie set against the wild and windy backdrop of these plains.  He and photographer Michal Englartstropers3 take advantage of the bleak landscape and produce an attractive work with Evgueni and Sacha Galperine producing an appropriate soundtrack.  Brent Vermeulen as Janno and Alex Van Dyk are totally convincing as the boys and dominate most of the scenes.stropers7  I look forward to Kallos’s next work.

♦♦♦+

Military Wives

Standard

military3

Another formulaic British feel-good movie from the director of The Full Monty.  Set in a military base in Britain,military6 it depicts the start of the military wives’ choirs that emerged during the Afghanistan campaigns and the need of the women to do things to keep them occupied.military2  It is all fairly glossy and superficial and you can see where the story is going a long way off but in fairness it steams along well enough to be watchable.military5  Part of this is due to the casting of Kristin Scott Thomas and Sharon Horganmilitary8 as the choir’s leaders, Katemilitary1 and Lisa, both stubborn determined women provide a fair few duels as each tries to impose her way of running the choir.military4  There are two or three really good scenes and the rest is pretty much cliché.

Lots of poetic licence too! A rainy afternoon type of movie.military7

♦♦++

 

Misbehaviour

Standard

misb5

In the fashion of British comedies from time immemorial, we visit 1970 and the Miss World contest held in London.  This event became famous for the protests of a group of women complaining about the objectification of women’s bodies, these were the days when the contestants had their measurements taken and published and they had to stand in their bathing suits with their backs to the camera.  This particular edition also featured serial womaniser and comedian Bob Hope (slimy Greg Kinnear)misb7 whose suggestive jokes would be totally unacceptable now.  The protesters are led by Sally Alexander (aspiring history student and played here by Keira Knightley in her most Keira mode)misb8 and Jo Robinson (Jessie Buckley), a defiant red-head of a very different background.misb2

Meanwhile, there is another issue involving racism.  To get around the criticism of Miss World still allowing Miss South Africa a part, they select a black candidate and call her Miss Africa South. Julia Morley, wife of the boss also increases the judging panel to include some black judges.  But the press is on to that as well.

The glue joining it all together is the eventual Miss World, Jennifer Hostenmisb6. Black, intelligent and an air hostess,misb1 she marks the start of a new pattern which allows for non-white girls to accede to the crown and she stands in between the “patriarchy” and the women’s libbers, pointing out that for some girls this contest is a chance to escape worse oppression. misb4 Gugu Mbatha-Raw gives a dignified performance in this role.

In the end, the story fades away but for a few minutes, this was a valuable challenge to male dominance and the stepping stone to future achievements for many.misb3  But despite the above cast and other stalwarts like Rhys Ifans as Morley and Lesley Manville as Hope’s wife, this is a relatively slight movie, carefully reproducing the era but seeming very out of date.

♦♦+

 

The Assistant

Standard

This feature by Australian documentary director Kitty Green is a sobering affair.  Not a film  for those who need action or high stakes drama, just a slow crunching minor tragedy.  If you can take the pace, you will find it engrossing.  We follow Jane, a new assistant in a film production company in New York.  She gets to work first at some ungodly hourassist2 and is one of the last to leave.assist5  She does all the gofer work: makes photocopies, fixes the photocopier, keeps meeting rooms clear, receives stocks and supplies, books taxis and hotels, rearranges meetings and helps show new employees the ropes.  She is treated like an automaton, frequently criticized and shown no sympathy by her colleagues.  The unseen boss is a Weinstein like figure capable of screaming down the phone at her and then sending her an email saying he is tough on her because she is so good.  As a portrayal of corporate America it is damning.assist6 That employees work in such a state of fear and disrespect reflects ill on this business and on society.

The shadow side of the film concerns the parade of young women through the offices of the boss. Some lose their earrings on the floor, others come with prepared speeches on CDs which are cast aside, others are brought in from out of town and installed in hotels which the boss then visits.  When Jane visits the head of Human Resources to question this, she is promptly told to mind her own business and look after her job.assist7

By the end of this normal but exhausting day, we can see how this way of work is soul destroying for those involved and that the #me too movement has plenty of material to keep working on.

Julia Garnerassist4 is excellent as Jane, having to convey much of what she is feeling in minimal facial movements and slight body shifts.  Matthew MacFadyenassist3 as the HR boss is suitably cynical.  Haunting music by Tamar Kali.

And, oh, the plastic and cardboard food they eat sums it all up!

♦♦♦♦