Monthly Archives: April 2020

Tom of Finland

Standard

tom7

The eponymous hero of this film is a graphic designer and cartoonist from Finland who became famous in a cult way for his erotic and pornographic drawings of mentom3 and ended up being a champion for bears and leather supporters in the US.

Dome Karukoski’s movie is actually a fairly sober biopic which takes us from the war in Finlandtom9 through the bleak 1950’s and an unsuccessful trip to Berlin to try to sell his work, to Touko’s (Tom’s real name) struggle to find pleasure in his day job and to keep his secret in conservative Helsinki, to success which emanates from the sale of his material via the Hollywood magazine industry.tom5  Now, his work hangs in galleries the world over and remains a force 30 years after his death.

The most interesting thing about this film is the story which is quite a tribute to a dogged perseverance and a sense that he was doing what he was meant to do, however much society tried to censor him.  It is the Americanstom4 who make him realise the value he has to so many people.

The actual film is a rather wooden and predictable undertaking.  Best is the recreation of the period and the muted photography and music (Hildur Gudnadottir in part responsible here).  Acting by Pekka Strangtom6 in the lead, Jessica Grabowsky as his sistertom 2 and Lauri Tilkanen as his loverUnknown is solid but overall there is nothing that leaps out of the movie and grabs you.  A rather sedate Scandinavian style for a man whose drawings were anything but.tom8

♦♦+

The Goldfinch

Standard

gold8

Based on a Pulitzer Prize winning novel by Donna Tartt, this film has been pretty much trashed by the critics and only a lukewarm box office success. Having not read the book, my questions were about whether it hung together as a story and as a piece of cinema.  Verdict?  Flawed, uneven but not without its positive features.  The main problems seem to come from adapting the book for a film version, it was nearly 800 pages long and seemingly full of detail, characterization and thought that are hard to compress into 2+ hours.gold7   So, decisions were made and perhaps those by John Crowley in direction and Peter Straughan, the screenplay writer were not always the best.  The event which triggers the story, a bomb at the Metopolitan Museum of Art is only filtered slowly back to us via flashback,gold4 when it is really the key to the whole story, especially the whereabouts of the painting which gives the film its title.

Most of the first part follows young Theo’s survival, at first with the family that fosters him and then with his father and father’s girlfriend in Nevada where Theo meets the mysterious Boris.gold6  It is later with a jump forward in time and with Theo back in NY that the mystery/thriller side of the movie lifts off and is rather hastily developed.gold3  So, there is something lopsided in the telling and the relationship dynamics don’t always get so clearly revealed either,

Oakes Fegleygold1 as young Theo is really very good, Ansel Elgort more than acceptable as the adult version and some good cameos by Jeffrey Wrightgold11 and Nicole Kidman.gold12  Luke Wilsongold10 as his father and Sarah Paulsongold9 have less satisfying parts and the two actors playing Boris don’t match up very well.

Great photography by Roger Deakins, both portraying New York and the sandy no mans land of Nevada.gold5

The whole film could have lost a good 15 minutes, as it does tend to drag especially in the Nevada part.

So, I feel there are scenes I will remembergold2 and issues the movie raises that are interesting but the whole film does not hang together as well as perhaps it should have.

♦♦+

 

In Fabric

Standard

fabr4

Peter Strickland is a British filmmaker based in Hungary who specializes in off-beat stylish productions that are like no one else’s work despite their familiarity to other cinema (Italian horror of the 70s).fabr1

Here we have a film set in Britain in the 70’s or early 80’s, a sort of grim unimaginative period with dreary shops (Dentley and Sopers is a department storefabr2 here of a fantastic kind, seemingly normal but peopled by weird staff and possibly live mannequins),fabr6 rigid work rules and awkward dating services.  We meet Sheila (Marianne Jean-Baptiste)fabr3 who is seeking to hook up after breaking up with her husband and who wants a nice new dress for her date.  She chooses a red one at D and S, or rather the dress chooses her and then she discovers that it has a life of its own and can cause mayhem.fabr10 The second half of the film considers Reg (Leo Bill) fabr8and Babs (Hayley Squires), a young couple about to be married who later acquire the same dress and have similar experiences.fabr5  Apart from that we see the shop at night and the strange behaviour of the main shop assistantfabr7 who removes her wig every evening and descends into a type of hell via a dumb waiter.

Very imaginative, with comments on our consumerism, banks and our sometimes senseless behaviour, In Fabric may be slightly overlongfabr9 and need editing but it is definitely unusual and keeps you wondering where it will take you, with a few scares on the way.

♦♦♦+

Joker

Standard

joker3

One of the biggest successes of the last 9 months which I finally got round to.

And like many reviewers I have my doubts.joker6  Is it really so clever and insightful or is it a cop-out which throws up all sorts of possible messages without really clearly standing for anything?  I certainly felt there was ambiguity and contradictions and that is for someone who is not steeped in the Batman/Joker history.joker2

So, taking the film at more of a face value, I felt that it showcased the talents of a very skilled actor, created mood well (Hildur Gudnadottir’s soundtrack fits the bill), recreated some elements of the 70s and 80s well, notably the talk show programme run by Murray, (Robert De Niro’s character)joker8 and the references to Taxi Driver and King of Comedy.  But the splicing of this portrayal of a society misfit with mental issues together with serious discontent among the poorer classes is not always the happiest fit.joker9  On top of that we have the abrupt instances of violence, which take us into the realm of serial killers, even if in this case most seem unpremeditated.  The final layer to consider is how much of what happens is real or a figment of Arthur’s sick mind.joker7

Juggling all of this I found the first half dark and sad, improving somewhat in the second half as we get more insight into Fleck as he is and he himself inhabits the role of the Joker more fully.joker4  There are some impactful scenes in this second half but still the question rises: is this real or effect?

Joaquin Phoenix is masterful in his work in this film even though his character is not easy to likejoker1 and he is not always backed up by the most helpful writing.

There are many who say that it reflects the USA today and refers to many occurrences like the mass shootings, riots from the underclass and corrupt politicians.  But that has always been there and it is unclear what the message is?  Be wary of your mentally illjoker5 because they may turn against society?  Who knows really?  I’m not sure I’d want to see the film again but I do think it offers itself for good discussions.

♦♦♦+

Perdona bonita pero Lucas me quería a mi

Standard

perdona3

A little nostalgia trip here to Madrid in the 1990s and a film in the line of the earlier Almodovar works; farce and slapstick wrapped up in a murder mystery.  Written and directed by a couple from the Canaries.

Three gay men share a flatperdona1 and rent a fourth room out to the handsome Lucasperdona4 who they all fall in love with.  Three months later he has been murdered and when the police detective comes to interrogate them, they all seem to have motives, as does the maid.perdona6 What is more, Lucas was the detective’s boyfriend and seemed to have something going with her number two.  Jordi Molla stars among others in this watchable if slightly overlong comedy.perdona2  It was also a play and perhaps works better on stage.  Nonetheless it raises a chuckle here and there!perdona5

♦♦+

Last Tango in Halifax series 4 and 5

Standard

hali2

Catching up with one of my all-time British favourites, albeit for 6 episodes (series 4-2, series 5 – 4), made in 2016 and the end of 2019/20.

Basically a family drama it has 4 important and sympathetic leads: Alan (Derek Jacobi), an 82 year-old who married his childhood sweetheart Celia (Anne Reid) only 7 years ago after each had previous marriages. Celia has a daughter, Caroline (Sarah Lancashire),hali3 a school principal, who used to be married to the wet John and had two sons, one now at university and the other ending high school and mucking around.  Later she got together with Kate and ended up with a daughter, after Kate was killed in an accident.  This is Flora.  Alan’s daughter is Gillian (Nicola Walker) who struggles to make it as a farmer above the Yorkshire town of Halifax.hali1  Her first husband abused her and committed suicide, then she married his brother (Robbie) who was a cop and things are now in trouble between them partly due to her past.  Gillian has the one son Raff, now married to Emhali5 and with a daughter Calamity.  They live on the farm with Gillian and Flora and Calamity are best friends.  John meanwhile has hooked up with alcoholic youth novelist Judith who has turned into a hit writer and is rolling in money.  John now lives in a plush househali7 and Alan and Cecilia are moving up too.

The main plotline in series 5 revolves around Ted, Alan’s brother (Timothy West) who returns from New Zealand after a lifetime there to revisit his old hauntshali4 but with no real plan.

The main features of this series written by the incomparable Sally Wainwright is the organic way, even the most ridiculous plot developments occurhali9 and the natural dialogues that weave all this together.  We get to see the characters warts and all but they are sympathetic and fallible human beings most trying to get on in live with varying degrees of success.  Celia is an arch snob at times, Alan can be too sentimental but they balance each other out.hali6  Caroline seems in-control but has plenty of wobbles inside, whereas Gillian seems always to be strugglinghali11 but has a resilience and down-to-earth humour that keeps her going.  The way the relationships have changed over the years and the way the children have grownhali10 give Halifax that special quality of making the viewer feel like part of the families too and like long-term neighbours.  Lancashire and Walkerhali8 are particularly able actresses at the top of their craft.

While some of the episodes here: 5.1 and 5.4 were perhaps more omnibus in nature and less integrated than other, the quality all round is excellent.

A pleasure

♦♦♦♦ ++

Label Me

Standard

Elegant and poignant mid-length German film about the relationship between Lars, a local professional who is well-offlabel6 and a sex-worker he picks up and starts to fall for.  This latter is Waseem, a Syrian refugee,label7 who is making some money this way until he gets a work permit.  He comes from a homophobic society and is clearly uncomfortable with what he is doing not to mention being bullied at the refugee centre. And he resists Lars’ overtures towards a closer relationship.  Lars also tries to shift him out of his comfort zone.label1  Interesting all round with superb photography by Malte Hafner and direction by Kal Kreusner.  Renato Schuch as Waseemlabel2 and Nikolaus Benda as Larslabel4 make a very credible pair of leads.

♦♦♦+

 

Papi Chulo

Standard

papi2

Better than expected comedy(¿?) by Irishman John Butler, set in LA.  Sean (Matt Bomer)papi1 is the weather presenter at a cable TV channel and has a meltdown on air a few months after the end of a relationship he has clearly not gotten over.  Given time off to recover he sets about finishing odd jobs at home and ends up hiring a Mexican day workerpapi8 to do a paint job.  This man, Ernesto (Alejandro Patiño)papi9 is a 55 year-old father of 5 who barely speaks English.  Sean, whose own grasp of Spanish is minimal takes it upon himself to use Ernesto as a sort of confidant/therapist/companion and takes his rowing,papi7 hiking and to a gay party in addition to the painting work. When he starts to get too heavy, Ernesto backs off unleashing even more angst and loss for Sean.

Basically, this is a story about the process of grievingpapi6 and adapting to loss and how for some people it can be so hard.  Butler makes it humorous and is aided by Bomer’s likeable almost slapstick characterization (The LA gaypapi5 who is trendy but underneath struggles with all that because he is lonely). The lack of verbal language in common between the two also gives us a few laughs and Patiño plays his character discretely and with respect.papi3

By the end, you do care about the characters and the chemistry between them is clear.papi4  Small but meaningful with comments on the LA world and the treatment of migrants thrown in.

♦♦♦

Almost Love (aka Sell By)

Standard

almost4

NY romantic comedy focusing on different characters at different stages of relationships. almost3 Adam and Marklin are at the five year point and wondering what else is there if they don’t plan on children.almost5  Elizabeth is at the 15 year point and thinks everything is settled. Cammy has a homeless man basically using her as a last resortalmost6 and Haley is the recipient of a schoolboy crush.

It’s all very nice and very much fodder we have seen before so for that it may be comforting though don’t watch it for any revelations.almost1

The highlight is a cameo by Patricia Clarksonalmost2 as a fake and very successful artist and Ludovic Littee’s photography is another strong point.

Nothing really off here and it fills a rainy afternoon void.

♦♦

La Fille Inconnue

Standard

inconnue2

2016 movie from the Dardenne brothers of Belgium.  Some feel they are losing their touch a little and this offering would suggest that their impact is not what it was.  Nonetheless, it is a decent enough movie. Jenny Davin is a young and very conscientious doctor in a rough area of Liege.  One night, as she is closing up and in the middle of a conflict with her intern, someone rings on the bell of her clinic.  She prevents her interninconnue7 from opening it “because if they really need help they will ring twice”.  Next day, the police arrive and her security camera reveals that it was a young girl from Gabon who has been found dead by the nearby river.  Jenny feels guilty and sets about trying to find the identity of the girl and even offers to pay for a funeral plot.  She asks around her patientsinconnue5 and the area and discovers that despite their insistence otherwise, people do know things and that sometimes this shows up in their health.  Her investigation leads her into the underbelly of society. Nothing too sordid, just dull and grim.inconnue4

The film has some interesting features.  I liked a lot the performance of Adele Haenelinconnue1 in the lead but she is such a closed and respectful character, dour even, that I can understand why audiences didn’t respond.inconnue3  The plot is relatively straightforward but gives the film some momentum, while as ever, the view of contemporary Belgian lower middle class society is interesting.  The main drawback to the film is however a monotony of tone and pacing that mean that even the “big” scenes have a flatness that is in fitting with context and characters but does not inspire.  A solid enough addition to their repertoire but not one of their best.  Jeremie Renierinconnue6 and Olivier Gourmet, favourite actors of the brothers both appear.

♦♦♦